[Introspective] "You dance to rock but you don't like Disco... 4"
James Cherry
girliedrinker at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Aug 9 19:11:39 PDT 2007
Sergio:
> i think that every 'disco' was released for different
> intentions through the years but never was meant to be
> a great new record, just a commercial one. it often
> includes several singles's remixes, b-sides or any
> previously unreleased new track, maybe to make
> available more psb tracks in one disc, that's what i
> think
Quite. The fan uproar is completely unfounded given the inconsistent nature
of the Disco series...
Disco - Great, but I think at the time only featured one otherwise
unavailable remix of an old B side.
Disco 2 - Included nothing new or previously unreleased and used some
terrible mixes (and mixing).
Disco 3 - Fairly patchy but did include much new material but also old
tracks and arguably some bad mixes.
Disco 4 - Some good, some bad and one exclusive remix.
I think the Boys look at the Disco series as a spin off series of albums (as
we should), something separate to their main body of work, a tool for
releasing material unsuitable for regular releases. They are for collectors
and fans and that's all. Only Disco and Disco 2 had singles, and they also
served as promotion for Please and Very. It's now well over a year since
Fundamental so it would be pointless releasing Integral now because
Fundamental isn't a current album (there's even been Concrete and two DVDs
since) and Disco 4 doesn't warrant a single. Of course I would LIKE it to
happen but it never really seemed likely in today's chart climate.
Personally I think they could've held off on Fundamentalism and released
that now as Disco 4. Instead we have both, so no complaints from me.
JPC
More information about the introspective
mailing list