[Introspective] Keep it on topic.

[Johan Østergaard]

Erm...I'm confused. Are you James Lick? I meant, why did James Lick not ban
Jeffrey Durst back when this list went completely beserk a couple of years
ago, rather than now when nothing much has happened.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don and Marsha Ackerman" <the.ackermans at juno.com>
To: <johan at private.dk>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Introspective] Keep it on topic.


> Where have I been? You'll like this. I've been emailing people directly
> off-list telling them to ignore Durst & other like him. I told them
> responding adds to the crap and does no one any good. Everyone didn't
> leave but most did. I disagree with the ones left can live with Jeffrey.
> I've been on Intro since 95 or 96 (who knows?) and year ago participated
> in petitions & flame wars. Now, I've learned to keep it quiet so you are
> not targeted.
>
> Don't worry about Durst - he's gotten his off-list.
>
> That's where I've been,
> Don
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:07:17 +0100 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan_=D8stergaard?=
> <johan at private.dk> writes:
> > Wow - where were you a couple of years ago when we begged for
> > moderation and
> > almost everyone left the list?
> >
> > The people who are left now are the ones that can live with Jeffrey
> > Durst
> > anyway...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Lick" <jlick at drivel.com>
> > To: <introspective at tcp.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:58 AM
> > Subject: [Introspective] Keep it on topic.
> >
> >
> > > Dear Members,
> > >
> > > This list is for discussing matters related to the Pet Shop Boys.
> > > If you want to discuss other matters, there's many appropriate
> > lists for
> > > that.  I've already removed one member from this list (take a wild
> > guess).
> > > If the offtopic flames continue, those participating may be
> > moderated or
> > > removed.
> > >
> > > ---- James Lick ---- jlick at drivel.com ---- http://drivel.com/